Santa Barbara, CA, U. Some religions have a strict stance on abortion and deem it immoral, regardless of the reason. THANK YOU AGAIN, Abortions essay JOB. More institutions should rise up to condemn such practice to save our morals, lives, and dignity so that… References Fr. How to choose academic level:. As per the law the patient is expected to take the burden of the compelling procedure, abortions essay.
Argumentative Essay on Abortion
Special abortions essay Promo code: SAVE The abortion debate is an ongoing controversy, abortions essay, continually dividing Americans along moral, legal, and religious lines, abortions essay. When you are writing an abortion argumentative abortions essayyou are free to support any side that you want. Whichever position you take, make sure you have good points and supporting facts. In this abortion essay, I have decided to take the pro-choice position: abortions essay woman carrying a fetus should be given the right to abort it or carry abortions essay baby to term.
In fact, my thesis statement for this argumentative essay is abortion should be legal and women should have the right to decide whether or not to terminate a pregnancy. My essay is divided into three basic parts, the introduction, the body, and the conclusion, abortions essay. A heated debate continues to surround abortions essay question of whether or not abortion should be legal, abortions essay. Wade Supreme Court case Parker, that declared abortion as a fundamental human right has served to bring this debate to an end.
The pro-choice brigade front an argument that abortion is a right that should be enjoyed by all women and one that should not be taken away by religious authority or abortions essay governments. They claim that this right cannot be superseded by the perceived right that should be enjoyed by a fetus or embryo. If not legalized, the pro-choice claim, women would resort to unsafe means. However, to pro-life, the life of a human being begins at fertilization and therefore abortion condemns an innocent human being to immoral murder, abortions essay. They further argue that the practice exposes the unborn human to pain and suffering. This paper argues that abortion should be legal and women should have the right to decide whether or not to terminate a pregnancy.
Just as abortions essay observed by the US Abortions essay Court in Roe v. Wade, an individual should be allowed certain privacy zones or areas, abortions essay. The decision of a pregnant woman to terminate her pregnancy abortions essay not should fall within this fundamental right Parker, Interfering with this right is a kin to deciding for a person the kind of people abortions essay may associate with or the kind of a person they may fall in love with. These kinds of private matters are very sensitive and any decision touching on them should be left at the discretion of an individual.
After all, abortions essay is the woman who knows why they would want to terminate a pregnancy. It could be that seeing the pregnancy to its maturity and eventual delivery would endanger the life of the bearer, abortions essay. It could also be that a woman is not comfortable with having a baby due to some reason s. Whatever reason a woman might have, abortions essay, it is their abortions essay affair; they should be left to handle it in private. On the same note, abortions essay, women get empowered by reproductive choice as they get the opportunity to freely exercise control over their bodies. Just like male members of the society, women should be allowed to be independent and be able to determine their future.
This includes the freewill of determining whether or not to have children. The ability to control their productive lives would ensure that women are well placed to take part equally in the social and economic matters of the society Mooney, abortions essay, It should not be that upon conceiving, a woman has no otherwise but to deliver the baby. What if the conception was accidental? Even if it was not accidental, a woman can realize or determine before delivery that she is just not ready to have the baby as she might have initially planned. At that point, they should have the freedom to terminate the pregnancy.
The fetus or embryo may be innocent as they claim. However, it is noteworthy that it is only after the fetus becomes able to survive outside the womb that personhood begins Ziegler, This is definitely after birth and not during the pregnancy or at conception. In this respect, the claim that abortion kills innocent human beings is actually not valid. On the contrary, this stance or statement culminates in the victimization of innocent women who have committed no wrong but exercised their right of abortions essay their reproductive life. Ideally, an embryo or fetus should not be considered a human being just yet.
Legal abortion also ensures that women may avoid maternal injury or death by securing professional and safe means of performing abortion. The point here is that illegalizing abortion would compel some women to resort to unsafe abortion means. Whether legal or not, a woman would make up their mind and terminate her pregnancy! Why then endanger the lives of pregnant women who may like to have an abortion by illegalizing the practice? In addition, the pro-life argument that a fetus feels pain during the procedure of abortion is less convincing. It may be that the reason a mother is terminating a pregnancy is to prevent the yet to be born child from facing the pains of the world.
Those opposed to abortion further argue that the practice brews a traumatic experience for women as it involves the death of a human being. Specifically, they contend that the experience emanates from a woman witnessing how she intentionally and violently condemns her unborn child to death by physically destroying it. They hold that it also subjects the woman to unacknowledged grief and thoughts of severed maternal attachments and as well violates her parental responsibility and instinct Major et al. According to this argument, this experience can be as traumatic as to plunge a woman into serious mental health problems, in what may be called post-abortion syndrome PAS, abortions essay. This syndrome may attract symptoms similar to those of post-traumatic stress disorder PTSDabortions essay, they say.
Anti-abortion crusaders abortions essay contend that the aftermath of undergoing the procedure may see a woman experience such PTSD related symptoms as substance abuse, abortions essay, guilt, shame, abortions essay, anger, grief, depression, denial, and flashbacks Major et al. Instead, she would appreciate that she was able to successfully terminate the pregnancy before it could grow to maturity. The decision to terminate a pregnancy should generally lie with pregnant women. It is a private decision that should not be interfered with, abortions essay.
Women should be able to determine when to have a child. If she deems it not yet time, she should be allowed to abort, abortions essay. A abortions essay actually kills nobody by aborting but rather prevents the fetus from being able to survive outside the womb. The reason for aborting should not be questioned, whether medical, involving incest or rape, or just personal. Whatever reason it might be, it falls within the right of a woman to determine and control their productive life, abortions essay. Major, B. et al. Abortion and mental health. American Psychologist64 9 Mooney, C. Should abortion be legal? San Diego, CA: ReferencePoint Press, Incorporated. Parker, W, abortions essay.
New York City, NY: Simon and Schuster. Schwarz, S, abortions essay. Understanding abortions essay from mixed feelings to rational thought. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. The introduction paragraph of an argumentative essay constitutes of 4 parts. I have also included opposing arguments to show the reader that I have considered both sides of the argument and that am able to anticipate and criticize any opposing arguments before they are even stated. I have made sure to show the reader abortions essay though I have written opposing arguments and that I do not agree with them.
The conclusion paragraph of this abortion essay constitutes of three main parts. The first part restates the main premises: The decision to terminate a pregnancy should generally lie with pregnant women. The second part presents 1 — 2 sentences which summarizes the arguments that support my thesis. And lastly my personal position. I tried to use credible resources for this essay. Books from respectable publishers on this subject. Peer reviewed articles and journals are also acceptable. Would you like to read a gun control argumentative essay? com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world.
Through our website, students can request for help in abortions essay diverse range of subjects and disciplines. We understand that studies are the foundation of success; yet they can be quite a challenge without extra abortions essay. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs. You must be logged in to post a comment. Do My Essay! Abortions essay not waste time. Get a complete paper today. Order essays, research papers, term papers, book reviews, assignments, dissertation, thesis Read more….
Argumentative Essay on Abortion — Sample Essay Published by gudwriter on October 24, October 24, No Bullshit!! Get A Custom Essay Special offer! Categories: Free Essays and Research Papers. Tags: Abortion argumentative essays Abortion essays Examples of Argumentative Essays. gudwriter Gudwriter. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Related Posts Free Essays and Research Papers Medicaid Essay Sample Do My Essay!
narrative essay topics for college
Alex McBride is a 3rd yr law scholar at Tulan Law School. He at present is clerking with Judge Susan Braden in Washington. McBrides article, Roe v. Wade , he explains the process in to keep abortion authorized. Norma L McCovey Roe claimed Texas criminalizing Roes proper to have an abortion. She mentioned the law was unconstitutional to her rights. However, there have been pointers set to particularly outline whether or not a lady can have an abortion. Joseph, C. Dems Spoiling for Planned Parenthood Fight. National Journal. Cameron Joseph is a young political journalist. He is at present working in Washington D.
C writing about the re-election of Obama. Planned Parenthood is a company that provides contraception and in addition performs abortions. Indiana officers say that taking funding for Medicaid to fund Planned Parenthood is unlawful. abortion abortions against arguments. Your email address will not be published. Free Essays Essay Topics Search Search for: Search. You are here: Home Free essay Arguments for abortion and against abortions. More Free Essay: Abortion Restrictions And Abortion Rates: Has State Abortion Policy Been Successful? She is the only person who knows best, if she would be able to take care of the unplanned child or not. In some cases, medical emergencies compel a woman to resort to this action. There Is a possibility that her own life might be at risk, If she delivers the child.
Some of the rape victims can be minors. Why should such victims go through the ordeal of bearing a child, which is a product of some unfortunate incident of their life? Technologies have enabled disease detection amongst unborn babies. Giving life to an unhealthy baby and watching it suffer all day and night can forced to produce a life? Giving life to an unwanted child might invite world of troubles for both mother and the child. So, are we being fair to the child? Why should abortion should be remained as illegal? It should not be confused with miscarriage which involves no human intention or contraception which uses various technologies to prohibit sperm and egg from producing a fertilized ovum after sexual intercourse.
Miscarriages are natural if sad occurrences, which raise no deep moral issues regarding human conduct? unless the woman was careless in her pregnancy. Contraception is officially opposed by Roman Catholics and some other Christians, but I take it to be in a moral category entirely separate from abortion since it does not involve the killing of a fetus ; therefore, it will not be addressed here. Rather than taking up the legal reasoning and history of abortion in America especially concerning Roe vs.. Wade , this essay makes a simple, straightforward moral argument against abortion.
Sadly, real arguments reasoned defenses of a thesis or claim are too rarely made on this issue. Instead, propaganda is exchanged. Given that the Obama administration is the most pro-abortion administration in the history of the United States , some clear moral reasoning is called for at this time. The first premise of the argument is that human beings have unique and incomparable value in the world. But anyone who holds that humans are special and worthy of unique moral consideration can grant this thesis even if their worldview does not ultimately support it. Of course, this will not move those like Peter Singer who do not grant humans any special status.
We cannot help that. Many true and Justified beliefs concerning human beings and other matters are denied by otherwise intelligent people. Second, the burden of proof should always be on the one taking a human life and the benefit of doubt should always be given to the human life. This is not to say that human life should never be taken. In an often cruel and unfair world, sometimes life-taking is necessary, as many people will grant. Cases include self-defense, the prosecution of a Just war, and capital punishment. Yet all unnecessary and intentional life taking is murder, a deeply evil and repugnant offense against human beings.
Those, such as absolute pacifists, who believe that it is never Justifiable to take a human life would also acknowledge this. Third, abortion nearly always takes a human life intentionally and gratuitously and is, therefore, morally unjustified, deeply evil, and repugnant? given what we have said about human beings. The fetus is, without question, a human being. Like produces like: apes procreate apes, rabbits procreate rabbits, and humans procreate humans. If the fetus is not human, what else could it possibly be? Could it be an ape or a rabbit? Some philosophers, such as Mary Anne Warren, have tried to drive a wedge between Persephone and humanity. That is, there may be persons who are not human such as God, angels, Test? if they exist , and there may be humans that are not persons fetus or those who lose certain functions after having possessed them.
While it is true that there may be persons who are not humans, it does not logically follow that there are humans who are not persons. The nonporous. When we separate Persephone from humanity, we make Persephone an achievement based on the possession of certain qualities. But what are these person-constituting qualities? Some say a basic level of consciousness; others assert ability outside the womb; still others say a sense of self-interest which probably does not obtain until after birth. All of these criteria would take away humanity from those in comas or other physically compromised situations.
Humans can lose levels of consciousness through injuries, and even infants are not viable without intense and sustained human support. Moreover, who are we to say Just what qualities make for membership in the moral community of persons? The stakes are very high in this question. If we are wrong in our identification of what qualities are sufficient for resonator and we allow a person to be killed, we have allowed the wrongful killing of nothing less than a person. Therefore, I argue that Persephone should be viewed as a substance or essence that is given at conception. The fetus is not a lifeless mechanism that only becomes what it is after several parts are put together? as is the case with a watch or an automobile. Rather, the fetus is a living human organism , whose future unfolds from within it according to internal principles.
For example, the fertilized ovum contains a complete genetic code that is distinct from that of the other or father. But this is not a mere inert blueprint which is separable from the building it describes ; this is a living blueprint that becomes what its human nature demands. Yet even if one is not sure when Persephone becomes a reality, one should err on the side of being conservative simply because so much is at stake. That is, if one aborts a fetus who is already a person, one commits a deep moral wrong by wrongfully killing an innocent human life. Just as we do not shoot target practice when we are told there may be children playing behind the targets, we should not abortion fetus if they may be persons with the right not to be killed.
As I have argued, it cannot be disputed that abortion kills a living, human being. Many argue that outside considerations experienced by the mother should overrule the moral value of the human embryo. If a woman does not want a pregnancy, she may abort. But these quality of life considerations always involve issues of lesser moral weight than that of the conservation and protection of a unique human life which considers the sanctity or innate and intrinsic value of a human life. An unwanted pregnancy is official, but the answer is not to kill a human being in order to end that pregnancy. Moreover, a baby can be put up for adoption and bring Joy to others.
No comments:
Post a Comment